Magna Charta Violated in the Putting of Restraint on a Plaintiff in Regard to His Right of Reply on the Evidence, and Substituting Discretion for Law;

Publisher Marketing: Full Title: "Magna Charta Violated in the Putting of Restraint on a Plaintiff in Regard to his Right of Reply on the Evidence, and Substituting Discretion for Law; Being a Report of the Hearing of the Case of Kelly v. Kelly, Mann, Young, & Roofe"Description: "The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification: ++++MonographHarvard Law School LibraryLiverpool: Woollard, 54, Castle Street, c.1887 Contributor Bio:  Kelly, James James Kelly works in critical care as an RN in the ICU at Lovelace Women's Hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico.